Non-Agreement Manifestation

 

I give a fuck about motherfuckers. 
It is interesting to say or not, I went to the theater; working room of it, three people. Hommage but I do with abc.
a) Hildegard von Bingen would have managed. 
b) There are no undercommons. I refuse to accept that all the queers, trans, color, mentality, physicality, philosophy and gender different flowers are not together more than the white capitalist man (Momo, Michael Ende, white capitalist man).
b).1. I DO REFUSE.

 

Article I.
a) Internet is for the ass.
b) (Quote): "Ah this is internet, I thought it was beer." (Theater)
b.1.) I DO AGREE.

 

 

Article y.
canon) Dadaism is the excuse why the title claims it is better than Martin Kippenberger and that "fascism wouldn't say here I am, I am fascism, it would rather say that fascism wouldn't say here I am I am fascism," it would say fascism wouldn't say here I am, I am fascism, it would rather say that fascism wouldn't say here I am I am fascism and that this is all better than the title of Martin Kippenberger and Dadaism an excuse. 
question) are we introspective, autotheoretical? nazis.
quote) leftist playing nazis.
nazis) however, anyways.
anyways, in any case) Knödelsong·Fredl Fesl (25.01.2017)
function) I sit here with the philosopher and the philantroph.

 

Article II.
 a) a system out of laziness is okay, it prevents from missing time living.
 a.1) I AGREE.
 b) a document is enough, so one remembers to tell again the story.

 

Article III.
This is my claim. 
 1. It is not to be quoted stupid social media stuff while there can be quoted things with sense.
  1.1. It is due to a lack of critical thinking that we must assume people soon to be too poorly minded.
 1.1.1. The human is an animal.
                                             Parenthese: Some animals understand human language, no human understands one animal.
A written rule exists independently of any individual organism.
             Not that it is to be said, because it might be boring, but also animals could have institutions (thinking of ants) could have contracts (thinking of lions) could have had performative
plans (thinking of pigs decorating and orgasming) and they paint, oh how good they paint (thinking of birds) and oh how wonderful they sing (thinking of the craws, awh).
The only difference between human animal and animal is that the human WRITES.                             
        And with the writing, there can be writings about the writing. With the writing comes a bit of the thinking.
The universe as a conceptual totality is inseparable from inscription. This, for example can be written.
Because the human can write, they write the concept god down, and they succeed.
1.Q: If 
 

e